4.4 Article

Role of the Distal Hydrogen-Bonding Network in Regulating Oxygen Affinity in the Truncated Hemoglobin III from Campylobacter jejuni

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 19, 页码 3946-3956

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi101137n

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [SAF2008-05595, PCI2006-A7-0688]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT06-25667, PME-2006-01581]
  3. CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires
  4. John Simon Guggenheim Foundation
  5. European Union
  6. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/EO10504/1]
  7. National Science Foundation [0956358]
  8. BBSRC [BB/E010504/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Division Of Chemistry
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0956358] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E010504/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen affinity in heme-containing proteins is determined by a number of factors, such as the nature and conformation of the distal residues that stabilize the heme bound-oxygen via hydrogen-bonding interactions. The truncated hemoglobin HI from Campylobacter jejuni (Ctb) contains three potential hydrogen-bond donors in the distal site: TyrB10, TrpG8, and HisE7. Previous studies suggested that Ctb exhibits an extremely slow oxygen dissociation rate due to an interlaced hydrogen-bonding network involving the three distal residues. Here we have studied the structural and kinetic properties of the G8(WF) mutant of Ctb and employed state-of-the-art computer simulation methods to investigate the properties of the O-2 adduct of the G8(WF) mutant, with respect to those of the wild-type protein and the previously studied E7(HL) and/or B10(YF) mutants. Our data indicate that the unique oxygen binding properties of Ctb are determined by the interplay of hydrogen-bonding interactions between the heme-bound ligand and the surrounding TyrB10, TrpG8, and HisE7 residues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据