4.4 Article

Observation of Water Molecules within the Bimolecular d(G3CT4G3C)2 G-Quadruplex

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 19, 页码 4155-4161

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi200201n

关键词

-

资金

  1. Slovenian research agency (ARRS)
  2. Ministry of higher education, science and technology of the Republic of Slovenia [P1-0242, J1-0986]
  3. EU [228461, 261863]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G-Rich oligonucleotides with cytosine residues in their sequences can form G-quadruplexes where G-quartets are flanked by G.C Watson-Crick base pairs. In an attempt to probe the role of cations in stabilization of a structural element with two G.C base pairs stacked on a G-quartet, we utilized solution state nuclear magnetic resonance to study the folding of the d(G(3)CT(4)G(3)C) oligonucleotide into a G-quadruplex upon addition of (NH4+)-N-15 ions. Its bimolecular structure exhibits antiparallel strands with edge-type loops. Two G-quartets in the core of the structure are flanked by a couple of Watson Crick G.C base pairs in a sheared arrangement. The topology is equivalent to the solution state structure of the same oligonucleotide in the presence of Na+ and K+ ions [Kettani, A., et al. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 282, 619, and Bouaziz, S., et al. (1998) J. MoL Biol. 282, 637). A single ammonium ion binding site was identified between adjacent G-quartets, but three sites were expected. The remaining potential cation binding sites between G-quartets and G.C base pairs are occupied by water molecules. This is the first observation of long-lived water molecules within a G-quadruplex structure. The flanking G C base pairs adopt a coplanar arrangement and apparently do not require cations to neutralize unfavorable electrostatic interactions among proximal carbonyl groups. A relatively fast movement of ammonium ions from the inner binding site to bulk with the rate constants of 21 s(-1) was attributed to the lack of hydrogen bonds between adjacent G.C base pairs and the flexibility of the T-4 loops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据