4.4 Article

Thermodynamic Stability and Folding Kinetics of the Major G-Quadruplex and Its Loop Isomers Formed in the Nuclease Hypersensitive Element in the Human c-Myc Promoter: Effect of Loops and Flanking Segments on the Stability of Parallel-Stranded Intramolecular G-Quadruplexes

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 43, 页码 9152-9160

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi100946g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1S10 RR16659, CA122952]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overexpression of the c-Myc proto-oncogene is associated with a broad spectrum of human cancers. Nuclease hypersensitivity element III1 (NHE III1) of the c-Myc promoter can form transcriptionally active and silenced forms, and the formation of DNA G-quadruplex structures has been shown to be critical for c-Myc transcriptional silencing. The major G-quadruplex formed in c-Myc NHE III1 is a mixture of four loop isomers, which have all been shown to be biologically relevant to c-Myc transcriptional control. In this study, we performed a thorough thermodynamic and kinetic study of the four c-Myc loop isomers in a K+ solution. The four loop isomers all form parallel-stranded G-quadruplexes with short loop lengths. While the parallel-stranded G-quadruplex has been known to favor short loop lengths, our results show that the difference in thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the four loop isomers, and hence between the parallel G-quadruplexes with similar loop lengths, is more significant than previously recognized. At 20 m M K+, the average difference in the T-m values between the most stable loop isomer 14/23 and the least stable loop isomer 11/20 is more than 10 degrees C. In addition, the capping structures formed by the extended flanking segments are shown to contribute to a stabilization of 2-3 degrees C in T-m for the c-Myc promoter G-quadruplex. Understanding the intrinsic thermodynamic stability and kinetic properties of the c-Myc G-quadruplex loop isomers can aid in our understanding of their biological roles and drug targeting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据