4.8 Article

Tumor hepatocytes and basement membrane-producing cells specifically express two different forms of the endostatin precursor, collagen XVIII, in human liver cancers

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 868-876

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.23189

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endostatin is an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth in mice, which may be generated by proteolytic cleavage of collagen XVIII. In normal tissues, 2 variants of the endostatin precursor, namely the SHORT and LONG forms, regulate tissue specificity. We analyzed 53 human liver biopsies (18 hepatocellular carcinomas, 16 metastases of colorectal canter, 3 cholangiocarcinomas, and 16 controls) by RNA dot blots, double-labeling immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization, using common and variant-specific probes. Tumor hepatocytes expressed the LONG form, whereas cholangiocarcinoma cells expressed the SHORT form, which was deposited in tumor basement membranes. Metastatic colorectal carcinoma cells did not express collagen XVIII. In the stromal compartment of primary and metastatic cancers, myofibroblasts and vascular endothelial cells expressed the SHORT form. Both basement membrane components, collagen IV and the SHORT collagen XVIII form, were codistributed and their mRNA levels strongly correlated (R = .75, P < .001). In addition, freshly isolated human hepatocytes expressed the LONG form and culture-activated stellate cells the SHORT form. Moreover, the full-length LONG form is a plasma protein. Thus, the LONG form is a hepatocyte-specific variant, and the SHORT form is a major component of the tumor extracellular matric in primary and metastatic liver cancers. In the clinical context, the global expression of the endogenous endostatin precursor, collagen XVIII, in liver cancer results from the combined expression profiles of tumor cells, stromal cells, and nontumor hepatocyes at the advancing edge of the tumor, particular to each type of cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据