4.6 Article

On the crystal structure of Ln2O2CO3 II (Ln = La and Nd)

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 158, 期 1, 页码 14-24

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/jssc.2000.9048

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The crystal structures of La2O2CO3 II and Nd2O2CO3 IT have been shown by means of high-resolution powder neutron (PND) and synchrotron X-rag diffraction (SXRD) combined with selected area electron diffraction (SAED) studies to be far more complex than earlier anticipated, owing to ordering of carbonate groups between (Ln(2)O(2)(2+))(n) layers. In contrast to earlier descriptions, the carbonate groups appear to be rather regular, Relative to an average model, the SAED patterns show additional scattering in the form of closely distributed, but essentially discrete, spots along <1/3, 1/3, l >*. Most of the observed scattering, H, can be described as H = G +/- mq(1) + nq(2), where G is the Bragg reflections of the underlying average P6(3)/mmc lattice, q(1) = [1/3, 1/3, +/-1/2]*, q(2) = [1/3, 1/3, +/-2/3]*, and m and n are integers. The additional scattering reflects ordering of the carbonate groups into trigonal layers between the (Ln(2)O(2)(2+))(n) layers, but it remains open whether q(1) and q(2) represent two separate structures with different stacking sequences of such lavers or whether they correspond to an even more complex stacking sequence. In any case, some disorder and rotational domain twinning are present. Two structure models, one for each modulation wave vector, n;ere constructed. Rietveld-type refinements of PND data of La2O2CO3 II were performed, approximating the complex, and at least partly disordered. stacking sequence as a two-phase mixture of the two modulated phases, Satisfactory convergence was achieved with R-p = 6,4%, R-wp = 8.3%, and chi (2) = 3.32, The isothermal espansivities, alpha (p), for La2O2CO3 II and Nd2O2CO3 II between 298 and 893 K were determined as 2.92x10(-5) and 2.70x10(-5) K-1, respectively. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据