4.4 Article

The Oxygen-Tolerant Hydrogenase I from Aquifex aeolicus Weakly Interacts with Carbon Monoxide: An Electrochemical and Time-Resolved FTIR Study

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 41, 页码 8873-8881

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi1006546

关键词

-

资金

  1. EU [212508]
  2. BMBF [03SF0318B, 03SF0355C]
  3. Max-Planck Society
  4. CNRS
  5. ANR, the city of Marseilles
  6. Region Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur
  7. Pole de competitivite CapEnergies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The [NiFe] hydrogenase (Hase I) involved in the aerobic respiration of the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus shows increased oxygen tolerance and thermostability and can form very stable films on pyrolytic graphite electrodes. Oxygen-tolerant enzymes, like the ones from A. aeolicus and Ralstonia eutropha, are reported to be insensitive to CO inhibition. This is in contrast to known and well-characterized (oxygen-sensitive) hydrogenases, for which carbon monoxide is a competitive inhibitor. In this study, the interaction of Hase 1 from A. aeolicus with CO is examined using in situ infrared electrochemistry and time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy. We could observe the formation of a CO adduct state, a finding that set the grounds to investigate the affinity of an O-2-tolerant enzyme for binding CO as well as the reversibility of this process. In the case of A. aeolicus, this extrinsic CO is shown to be weakly attached and the adduct state is light-sensitive at low temperatures. The energetic parameters for the rebinding of CO at the active site were estimated from the rate constants of this process after photolysis and the results compared to those obtained for standard hydrogenases. Formation of a weak Ni-CO bond in the active site of Hase I most likely results from the different interaction of this enzyme with inhibitors and/or different active site electronic properties to which non standard amino acid residues in the vicinity of the active site might contribute.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据