4.4 Article

Probing the Charge Cluster Mechanism in Amphipathic Helical Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 19, 页码 4076-4084

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi100378m

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 86608]
  2. National Institutes of Health [AI054515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clustering or anionic lipids away from zwitterionic ones by cationic antimicrobial agents has recently been established as a mechanism of action of natural small, flexible peptides as well as non-natural synthetic peptide mimics. One of the largest classes of antimicrobial peptides consists of peptides that form cationic amphipathic helices on membranes and whose toxic action is dependent on the formation of pores in the membrane or through the carpet mechanism. We have evaluated the role of anionic lipid clustering for five of these peptides, i.e., MSI-78, MSI-103, MSI-469, MSI-843, and MSI-1254, with different sequences and properties. We determined whether these amphipathic helical cationic antimicrobial peptides cluster anionic lipids from zwitterionic ones and if this property is related to the species specificity of their toxicity. All live of these peptides were capable of lipid clustering, in contrast to the well-studied amphipathic helical antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2, which does not. We ascribe this difference to the lower density of positive charges in magainin 2. Peptides that efficiently cluster anionic lipids generally have a ratio of MIC for Staphylococcus aureus to that for Escherichia colt of > 1. The addition of an N-terminal octyl chain did not preclude anionic charge clustering, although the ratio of MIC for S. aureus to that for E. colt was somewhat lowered. In most Gram-positive bacteria, there is a predominance of anionic lipids in the cytoplasmic membrane. In Gram-negative bacteria, however, clustering of anionic lipids away from zwitterionic ones is emerging as an important contributing mechanism of bacterial toxicity for some antimicrobial agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据