4.2 Article

Microsomal metabolism of the terpene 1,8-cineole in the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), koala (Phascolarctos cinereus), rat and human

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 205-221

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00498250110043535

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. This study reports on the pathways of metabolism and enzyme kinetics of the Eucalyptus terpene, 1,8-cineole, by liver microsomes from the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) and koala (Phascolarctos cinereus)(animals that normally include this terpene in their diet), rat and human. 2. The rank order of the ability to metabolize 1,8-cineole with respect to overall 1,8-cineole intrinsic clearance (CL'(int)= V-max/K-m in mul mg protein(-1) min(-1)) was koala (188) > possum (181) much greater than rat (28) human (12). This order supports the hypothesis that adaptation to a Eucalyptus diet involves enhanced metabolism of terpenes. 3. The metabolism of 1,8-cineole was also studied in the liver from brushtail possum pretreated with a mixture of terpenes, which have previously been shown to induce cytochrome P450 enzymes. Rats were pretreated with the same mixture of terpenes or phenobarbitone. 4. Terpene pretreatment more than doubled the CL'(int) of 1,8-cineole by brushtail possum liver microsomes (from 180 to 394 mul mg protein(-1) min(-1)) and increased rat CL'(int) by nearly 10-fold (from 28 to 259 mul mg protein(-1) min(-1)), but still less than the induced possum value. However, phenobarbitone had the greatest inducing effect, increasing the rat CL'(int) to 1825 mul mg protein(-1) min(-1). 5. A regioselective preference of oxidation was evident between adapted and non-adapted species. In rat and human oxidation was preferred at the aliphatic ring carbons over methyl substituents. In possum, many of the available carbons were utilized, however metabolism at methyl substituents was preferred. In the koala, oxidation occurred primarily at the methyl substituents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据