4.4 Article

Characterization of Chloride-Depleted Human Sulfite Oxidase by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Experimental Evidence for the Role of Anions in Product Release

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 25, 页码 5154-5159

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi902172n

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [52005889] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [S10RR020959, S10 RR020959-010001, S10 RR020959-01, S10 RR020959] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [1F32GM082136-01, R01 GM037773, R01 GM037773-34S1, R01 GM037773-34, F32 GM082136, GM-037773, R01 GM037773-35] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mo(V) state of the molybdoenzyme sulfite oxidase (SO) is paramagnetic and can be studied by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. Vertebrate SO at pH <7 and >9 exhibits characteristic EPR spectra that correspond to two structurally different forms of the Mo(V) active center termed the low-pH (lpH) and high-pH (hpH) forms, respectively. Both EPR forms have an exchangeable equatorial OH but its orientation in the two forms is different. It has been hypothesized that the formation of the lpH species is dependent on the presence of chloride. In this work, we have prepared and purified samples of the wild type and various mutants of human SO that are depleted of chloride. These samples do not exhibit the typical lpH EPR spectrum at low pH but rather exhibit spectra that are characteristic of the blocked species that contains an exchangeable equatorial sulfate ligand. Addition of chloride to these samples results in the disappearance of the blocked species and the formation of the lpH species. Similarly, if chloride is added before sulfite, the lpH species is formed instead of the blocked one. Qualitatively similar results were observed for samples of sulfite-oxidizing enzymes from other organisms that were previously reported to form a blocked species at low pH. However, the depletion of chloride has no effect upon the formation of the hpH species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据