4.6 Article

Lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node imaging and gamma probe defection in breast cancer with Tc-99m nanocolloidal albumin - Results of an optimized protocol

期刊

CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 293-298

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003072-200104000-00002

关键词

breast cancer; gamma probe; lymphoscintigraphy; nanocolloidal albumin; sentinel node

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to aid in the standardization of lymphoscintigraphy for detecting the sentinel node (SN) in breast cancer using Tc-99m-labeled nanocolloidal albumin. Materials and Methods: One hundred twenty-three women with proved breast cancer were enrolled. Four injections of 10 to 15 MBq (0.27 to 0.41 mCi) Tc-99m nanocolloid in 0.1 mi physiologic saline were administered intra- and subdermally at the margin of the skin overlying the tumor. Planar scintigraphic images in the lateral and anterior projections were obtained 2.5 to 18 hours after tracer administration. With a gamma probe used as a guide, all radioactive lymph nodes in the axilla were resected, Complete dissection then followed. Results: In 116 of the 123 (94%) women, axillary nodal tracer uptake was revealed. Six of the 7 women in whom detection failure occurred had histologically proved tumor infiltration of the lymphatics and axillary involvement. In 36 (31%) of the patients with visualized lymph nodes, the SN was metastatic. The remaining 80 patients with negative SN included three cases with axillary involvement. The sensitivity of the SN with respect to the histologic status of the entire axilla thus was 92.3%, and the negative predictive value was 96.3%. The overall accuracy of the method was 97.4%. The number of hot nodes in women with and without axillary involvement was significantly different. Conclusions: The described protocol represents an easily reproduced and reliable method for SN detection in breast cancer. Furthermore, the number of visualized axillary nodes reflects the histologic status of the axilla.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据