4.7 Article

Pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer

期刊

CHEST
卷 119, 期 4, 页码 1069-1072

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.4.1069

关键词

carcinoembryonic antigen; colorectal cancer; lung metastases; prognosis; surgical resection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We reviewed our experience in the surgical treatment of 47 patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases and investigated factors affecting their survival. Method: From September 1986 to December 1999, 47 patients underwent 59 thoracotomies for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Results: The median interval between colorectal resection and lung resection (disease-free interval [DFI]) was 33 months. Overall, 5-year survival was 48%, Five-year survival was 51% for patients with solitary metastasis (n = 30), 47% for patients with ipsilateral multiple metastases (n = 11), and 50% for patients with bilateral metastases (n = 6), and there were no significant differences. Five-year survival was 80.8% for 14 patients with DFI of < 2 years and 39.7% for 30 patients with a DFI of > 2 years (p = 0.22). Five-year survival for 11 patients with normal prethoracotomy carcinoembryonic antigen (CFA) levels was 70%, and that for 26 patients with elevated prethoracotomy CEA levels (> 5 ng/mL) was 36% (p < 0.05). Eight patients had extrathoracic disease. The median survival time after pulmonary resection was 18.5 months, and the 5-year survival was 60%, A second resection for recurrent metastases was performed in five patients, and a third resection was done in one patient, All six patients are alive, The median survival of five patients who underwent a second thoracotomy was 22 months (range, 2 to 68 months), and one patient is alive 39 months after the third resection. Conclusion: Pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer may help prolong survival in selected patients, even with bilateral lesions, recurrent metastasectomy, or extrathoracic disease. Prethoracotomy CEA level was found to be a significant prognostic factor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据