期刊
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 249-276出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00131640121971220
关键词
-
Five procedures for estimating a common risk difference in a set of independent 2 x 2 tables were assessed via Monte Carlo simulation in terms of their bias, efficiency, confidence level adjustment, and statistical power. The maximum likelihood estimator showed the best performance, very closely followed by Cochran's and Mantel-Haenszel's procedures. The conditional weighted estimator, d(CW), showed an irregular performance. The unweighted estimator, du. showed less efficiency and statistical power than that of the other procedures. As a consequence, the use of the d(CW) and d(U) estimators is not recommended. The implications of the results in the practice of meta-analysis are discussed.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据