4.7 Article

Variable X-ray absorption in the Seyfert 2 galaxy Markarian 348

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 550, 期 2, 页码 635-643

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/319778

关键词

galaxies : active; galaxies : individual (Markarian 348); galaxies : Seyfert; X-rays : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer monitoring observations of the Seyfert 2 galaxy Mrk 348 spanning a 6 month period. The time-averaged spectrum in the 3-20 keV band shows many features characteristic of a Compton-thin Seyfert 2 galaxy, namely, a hard underlying power-law continuum (Gamma approximate to 1.8) with heavy soft X-ray absorption (N-H similar to 10(23) cm(-2)) plus measurable iron K alpha emission (equivalent width similar to 100 eV) and, at high energy, evidence for a reflection component (R less than or similar to 1). During the first half of the monitoring period, the X-ray continuum flux from Mrk 348 remained relatively steady. However, this was followed by a significant brightening of the source (by roughly a factor of 4) with the fastest change corresponding to a doubling of its X-ray flux on a timescale of about 20 days. The flux increase was accompanied by a marked softening of the X-ray spectrum most likely attributable to a factor of similar to3 decline in the intrinsic line-of-sight column density. In contrast, the iron K alpha line and the reflection components showed no evidence of variability. These observations suggest a scenario in which the central X-ray source is surrounded by a patchy distribution of absorbing material located within about a light-week of the nucleus of Mrk 348. The random movement of individual clouds within the absorbing screen, across our line of sight, produces substantial temporal variations in the measured column density on timescales of weeks to months and gives rise to the observed X-ray spectral variability. However, as viewed from the nucleus, the global coverage and typical thickness of the cloud layer remains relatively constant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据