4.4 Article

Hydrophobic Core of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein for Cholesterol Transport

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 1198-1209

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi801514e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 HD057876]
  2. March of Dimes, American Heart Association
  3. Pfizer, Inc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), the first family member of START (StAR-related lipid transport) proteins, plays an essential role by facilitating the movement of cholesterol from the outer to inner mitochondrial membrane. Wild-type and mutant StAR binds cholesterol with similar intensity, but only wild-type StAR can transport it to mitochondria. Here, we report that the hydrophobic core is crucial for biological activity of proteins with START domains. Wild-type StAR increased steroidogenic activity by 7-9-fold compared to mutant R182L StAR, but both of them showed similar near-UV CD spectra. The fluorescence maximum of wild-type StAR is red shifted in comparison to mutant StAR under identical urea concentration. TFE increased the a-helical contribution of wild-type StAR more than the mutant protein. Acrylamide quenching for the wild-type protein (K-SV = 12.0 +/- 0.2-11.2 +/- 0.5 M-1) exceeded that of the mutant protein (K-SV = 4 +/- 0.2 M-1). Consistent with these findings, the hydrophobic probe ANS bound wild-type StAR (K-app = 8.1 x 10(5) M-1) to a greater degree than mutant StAR (K-app = 3.75 x 10(5) M-1). Partial proteolysis examined by mass spectrometry suggests that only wild-type StAR has a protease-sensitive C-terminus, but not the mutant. Stopped-flow CD revealed that the time of unfolding of mutant StAR was 0.017 s. In contrast, the wild-type StAR protein is unfolded in 16.3 s. In summary, these results demonstrate that wild-type StAR adopts a very flexible form due to the accommodation of more water molecules, while mutant StAR is generated by an alternate folding pathway making it inactive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据