4.4 Article

Kinetic Stability of the Flavin Semiquinone in Photolyase and Cryptochrome-DASH

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 48, 期 48, 页码 11399-11411

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi901371s

关键词

-

资金

  1. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photolyases and cryptochromes (CRY) are structurally homologous flavoproteins with divergent functions. While photolyases repair UV-damaged DNA by photoinduced electron transfer from their FAD cofactor, CRY are involved in varied Cellular processes, including light-dependent plant growth, regulation of mammalian circadian rhythm, and possibly magneto reception. Despite their importance in Nature and human health, little is known about how they tune their FAD redox properties to achieve remarkable functional diversity. In this study, we reveal a kinetic mechanism, exploited by cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase (PL), for regulating the stability of its FAD semiquinone (sq). We find that the sq in CRY-DASH (Synechocystis) is substantially more reactive toward oxidation than in PL (Anacystis nidulans) and, using deuterium isotope and pH effects, show that rate-limiting proton transfer contributes to the exceptional kinetic stability of the PL sq. Through mutagenesis, we identify two PL-specific residues in the flavin binding pocket, Trp392 and Gly389 (Try398 and Asn395 in CRY-DASH, respectively), that ensure this kinetic stability, possibly through interactions with the adenine moiety of FAD and/or adjusting the polarity of the binding site. Significantly, these relatively distal residues have a much more profound impact than two amino acids closer to the FAD. By quantifying sq stability in a series of PL-CRY exchange mutants, our Findings pave the way for investigations aimed at correlating sq stability with function in these proteins. As is being recognized with other flavoproteins, we expect that kinetic tuning of the rates of electron transfer will play a function-defining role in photolyases and cryptochromes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据