4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Central auditory plasticity: Changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training

期刊

EAR AND HEARING
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 79-90

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC01510] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether the N1-P2 complex reflects training-induced changes in neural activity associated with improved voice-onset-time (VOT) perception, Design: Auditory cortical evoked potentials N1 and P2 were obtained from 10 normal-hearing young adults in response to two synthetic speech variants of the syllable \ba\, Using a repeated measures design, subjects were tested before and after training both behaviorally and neurophysiologically to determine whether there were training-related changes. In between pre- and post-testing sessions, subjects were trained to distinguish the -20 and -10 msec VOT \ba\ syllables as being different from each other. Two stimulus presentation rates were used during electrophysiologic testing (390 msec and 910 msec interstimulus interval). Results: Before training, subjects perceived both the -20 msec and -10 msec VOT stimuli as /ba\, Through training, subjects learned to identify the -20 msec VOT stimulus as mba and -10 msec VOT stimulus as ba. As subjects learned to correctly identify the difference between the -20 msec and -10 msec VOT syllabi, an increase in N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude was observed. The effects of training were most obvious at the slower stimulus presentation rate. Conclusions: As perception improved, N1-P2 amplitude increased. These changes in waveform morphology are thought to reflect increases in neural synchrony as well as strengthened neural connections associated with improved speech perception. These findings suggest that the N1-P2 complex may have clinical applications as an objective physiologic correlate of speech-sound representation associated with speech-sound training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据