4.4 Article

Structural properties of recombinant nonrepetitive and repetitive parts of major ampullate spidroin 1 from Euprosthenops australis:: Implications for fiber formation

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 3407-3417

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi702432y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spider dragline silk proteins, spidroins, have a tripartite composition; a nonrepetitive N-terminal domain, a central repetitive region built up from many iterated poly-Ala and Gly rich blocks, and a C-terminal nonrepetitive domain. It is generally believed that the repetitive region forms intermolecular contacts in the silk fibers, while precise functions of the terminal domains have not been established. Herein, thermal, pH, and salt effects on the structure and aggregation and/or polymerization of recombinant N- and C-terminal domains, a repetitive segment containing four poly-Ala and Gly rich coblocks, and combinations thereof were studied. The N- and C-terminal domains have mainly alpha-helical structure, and interestingly, both form homodimers. Dimerization of the end domains allows spidroin multimerization independent of the repetitive part. Reduction of an intersubunit disulfide in the C-terminal domain lowers the thermal stability but does not affect dimerization. The repetitive region shows helical secondary structure but appears to lack stable folded structure. A protein composed of this repetitive region linked to the C-terminal domain has a mainly alpha-helical folded structure but shows an abrupt transition to beta-sheet structures upon heating. At room temperature, this protein self-assembles into macroscopic fibers within minutes. The secondary structures of none of the domains are altered by pH or salt. However, high concentrations of phosphate affect the tertiary structure and accelerate the aggregation propensity of the repetitive region. Implications of these results for dragline spidroin behavior in solution and silk fiber formation are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据