4.4 Article

Quercetinase QueD of Streptomyces sp FLA, a Monocupin Dioxygenase with a Preference for Nickel and Cobalt

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 46, 页码 12185-12196

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi801398x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FE 383/9]
  2. University of Munster

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quercetinase (Quel) of Streptomyces sp. FLA is an enzyme of the monocupin family and catalyzes the 2,4-dioxygenolytic cleavage of the flavonol quercetin. After expression of the queD gene in Escherichia coli, high specific Quel) activity was found in crude cell extracts when the growth medium was supplemented with NiCl2 or COCl2, but not when Mn2+, Fe2+, Cu2+, or Zn2+ was added. The metal occupancy of Ni- and Co-QueD purified from these cells was <= 50%, presumably due to strong overproduction of QueD in E coli. Circular dichroism spectroscopy indicated the same folded structure with a high content of beta-sheet for the Ni and Co protein. The apparent kinetic constants for quercetin of Ni-QueD (k(cat) = 40.1 s(-1), and K-m = 5.75 mu M) and Co-QueD (k(cat) = 7.6 s(-1), and K-m = 0.96, mu M) indicate similar catalytic efficiencies; however, the similar to 5-fold lower apparent K-m value of Ni-QueD for dioxygen suggests that the nickel enzyme performs better under physiological conditions. The pH dependence of k(cat,app) indicates that an ionizable group with a pK(a) near 6.8 has to be deprotonated for catalysis. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of resting Co-QueD are indicative of a high-spin (S = 3/2) Co2+ species in a tetrahedral or trigonal-bipyramidal coordination geometry. Anoxic binding of quercetin to QueD drastically altered the hyperfine pattern at g approximate to 6 without changing the valence state of the Co(II) center and elicited a hypsochromic shift of UV-vis absorption band I of quercetin. On the basis of spectroscopic data, and considering the organic chemistry of flavonols, a nonredox role of the metal center in catalysis is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据