4.4 Article

Kinetics and Mechanism of Inhibition of a Serine β-Lactamase by O-Aryloxycarbonyl Hydroxamates

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 46, 页码 12037-12046

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi8015247

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI-17986]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The class C serine beta-lactamase of Enterobacter cloacae P99 is irreversibly inhibited by O-aryloxycarbonyl hydroxamates. A series of these new inhibitors has been prepared to investigate the kinetics and mechanism of the inactivation reaction. A pH-rate profile for the reaction indicated that the reactive form of the inhibitor is neutral rather than anionic. The reaction rate is enhanced by electron-withdrawing aryloxy substituents and by hydrophobic substitution on both aryloxy and hydroxamate groups. Kinetics studies show that the rates of loss of the two possible leaving groups, aryloxide and hydroxamate, are essentially the same as the rate of enzyme inactivation. Nucleophilic trapping experiments prove, however, that the aryl oxide is the first to leave. It is likely, therefore, that the rate-determining step of inactivation is the initial acylation reaction, most likely of the active site serine, yielding a hydroxamoylenzyme intermediate. This then partitions between hydrolysis and aminolysis by Lys 315, the latter to form an inactive, cross-linked active site. A previously described crystal structure of the inactivated enzyme shows a carbamate cross-link of Ser 64 and Lys 315. Structure-activity studies of the reported compounds suggest that they do not react at the enzyme active site in the same way as normal substrates. In particular, it appears that the initial acylation by these compounds does not involve the oxyanion hole, an unprecedented departure from known and presumed reactivity. Molecular modeling suggests that an alternative oxyanion hole may have been recruited, consisting of the side chain functional groups of Tyr 150 and Lys 315. Such an alternative mode of reaction may lead to the design of novel inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据