4.4 Article

Impact of Distal Side Water and Residue 315 on Ligand Binding to Ferric Mycobacterium tuberculosis Catalase-Peroxidase (KatG)

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 47, 页码 12583-12592

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi801511u

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [AI060014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalase-peroxidase (KatG) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is important for the virulence of this pathogen and also is responsible for activation of isoniazid (INH), an antibiotic in use for over 50 years in the first line treatment against tuberculosis infection. Overexpressed Mtb KatG contains a heterogeneous population of heme species that present distinct spectroscopic properties and, as described here, functional properties. A six-coordinate (6-c) heme species that accumulates in the resting enzyme after purification is defined as a unique structure containing weakly associated water on the heme distal side. We present the unexpected finding that this form of the enzyme, generally present as a minority species along with five-coordinate (5-c) enzyme, is the favored reactant for ligand binding. The use of resting enzyme samples with different proportional composition of 5-c and 6-c forms, as well as the use of KatG mutants with replacements at residue 315 that have different tendencies to stabilize the 6-c form, allowed demonstration of more rapid cyanide binding and preferred peroxide binding to enzyme containing 6-c heme. Optical-stopped flow and equilibrium titrations of ferric KatG with potassium cyanide reveal complex behavior that depends in part on the amount of 6-c heme in the resting enzymes. Resonance Raman and low-temperature EPR spectroscopy clearly demonstrate favored ligand (cyanide or peroxide) binding to 6-c heme. The 5-c and 6-c enzyme forms are not in equilibrium on the time scale of the experiments. The results provide evidence for the likely participation of specific water molecule(s) in the first phases of the reaction mechanism of catalase-peroxidase enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据