4.4 Article

Structural features responsible for the biological stability of Histoplasma's virulence factor CBP

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 15, 页码 4427-4438

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi701495v

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [2P41RR00954, P41 RR000954] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI025584-17, R56 AI025584, AI25584, R01 AI025584] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK052574-08, DK52574, DK48046, P30 DK052574, R01 DK048046] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The virulence factor CBP is the most abundant protein secreted by Histoplasma capsulatum, a pathogenic fungus that causes histoplasmosis. Although the biochemical function and pathogenic mechanism of CBP are unknown, quantitative Ca2+ binding measurements indicate that CBP has a strong affinity for calcium (K-D = 6.45 +/- 0.4 nM). However, no change in structure was observed upon binding of calcium, prompting a more thorough investigation of the molecular properties of CBP with respect to self-association, secondary structure, and stability. Over a wide range of pH values and salt concentrations, CBP exists predominantly as a stable, noncovalent homodimer in both its calcium-free and -bound states. Solution-state NMR and circular dichroism (CD) measurements indicated that the protein is largely cc-helical, and its secondary structure content changes little over the range of pH values encountered physiologically. ESI-MS revealed that the six cysteine residues of CBP are involved in three intramolecular disulfide bonds that help maintain a highly protease resistant structure. Thermally and chemically induced denaturation studies indicated that unfolding of disulfide-intact CBP is reversible and provided quantitative measurements of protein stability. This disulfide-linked, protease resistant, homodimeric a-helical structure of CBP is likely to be advantageous for a virulence factor that must Survive the harsh environment within the phagolysosomes of host macrophages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据