4.4 Article

Protease-Activated Receptor 4 Uses Anionic Residues To Interact with α-Thrombin in the Absence or Presence of Protease-Activated Receptor 1

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 50, 页码 13279-13286

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi801334s

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association Beginning [0865441D]
  2. University Hospitals Case Medical Center [P30 A43707]
  3. Comprehensive Cancer Center of Case Western Reserve University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thrombin activates protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) faster than protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR4) due to a hirudin-like sequence in the exodomain of PART that binds thrombin's exosite I. However, recombinant exodomain studies indicate that PAR4 does have extended contacts with a-thrombin that influence PAR4's kinetics of cleavage. In this report, the role of an anionic cluster (Asp(57), Asp(59), Glu(62), and Asp(65)) in the exodomain of PAR4 is examined for its influence on cleavage and activation of PAR4 on cells in the absence or presence of PAR1. alpha-Thrombin induces wild-type PAR4 (PAR4-wt) calcium flux with an EC(50) of 110 nM, whereas mutation of the four anionic residues (PAR4-AAAA) increases the EC(50) to 641 nM. In contrast, PAR4-wt and PAR4-AAAA are activated by gamma-thrombin with similar EC(50) values (588 and 449 nM, respectively; p = 0.48), suggesting a role for alpha-thrombin's exosite I in PAR4 activation. Coexpression of PAR1 lowered the EC(50) of cleavage for PAR4-wt from 321 to 26 nM and for PAR4-AAAA from 1.5 mu M to 360 nM. Individual point mutations at Asp(57), Asp(59), Glu(62), and Asp(65) show that PAR4-D57A is activated by alpha-thrombin with the same EC(50) as PAR4-wt (140 nM) whereas PAR4-D59A is the same as PAR4-AAAA (699 nM). Glu(62) and Asp(65) contribute to alpha-thrombin recognition, but to a lesser extent. This report shows that PAR4 uses its anionic cluster to interact with alpha-thrombin and that this interaction is important even in the presence of PAR1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据