4.4 Article

Identification of a consensus DNA-binding site for the Arabidopsis thaliana SBP domain transcription factor, AtSPL14, and binding kinetics by surface plasmon resonance

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 47, 期 12, 页码 3645-3653

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi701431y

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteins with a conserved Cys- and His-rich SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein (SBP) domain are transcription factors restricted to photosynthetic organisms that possess a novel two Zn-finger structure DNA-binding domain. Despite the fact that altered expression of some SBP-encoding genes has profound effects on organism growth and development, little is known about SBP domain protein target genes. Misexpression of the Arabidopsis thaliana AtSPL14 SBP domain gene confers resistance to programmed cell death and modifies plant architecture. A consensus DNA-binding motif for AtSPL14 was identified by systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) or random binding site selection (RBSS). DNA recognized by AtSPL14 contained the core binding motif (GTAC) found for other SBP domain proteins, but mutational analyses indicated that at least one additional flanking nucleotide is necessary for effective AtSPL14-DNA interaction. Comparison of several SBP domain amino acid sequences allows us to hypothesize which specific amino acids might participate in this sequence-specific DNA recognition. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) with mutant AtSPL14 DNA-binding domain proteins indicated that not all of the Zn2+ ion coordinating ligands in the second Zn structure are strictly required for DNA binding. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was used to evaluate AtSPL14 in vitro binding kinetics for comparison of equilibrium binding constants with other SBP domain proteins. These data provide a strong basis for further experiments aimed at defining and distinguishing the sets of genes regulated by the closely related SBP domain family members.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据