4.3 Article

Serum and CSF levels of MCP-1 and IP-10 in multiple sclerosis patients with acute and stable disease and undergoing immunomodulatory therapies

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY
卷 115, 期 1-2, 页码 192-198

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-5728(01)00261-2

关键词

chemokines; cerebrospinal fluid; multiple sclerosis; inflammation; glucocorticoids; interferon-beta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two chemokines, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 and gamma -interferon inducible protein (IP)-10, are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). We measured MCP-1 and IP-10 levels in serum and CSF samples from 38 acute and 25 stable MS patients and from 40 controls. The latter consisted in patients with other inflammatory neurological diseases (OIND) or with non-inflammatory neurological diseases, and healthy controls. CSF MCP-1 levels exceeded those found in serum in all the patients studied as well as in healthy controls. CSF MCP-1 levels were significantly Lower in acute MS [468 +/- (S.E.M.) 18 pg/ml] than in stable MS (857 +/- 104 pg/ml). When detectable, serum and CSF IP-10 levels were significantly higher in acute MS (serum 331 +/- 66 pg/ml; CSF 118 +/- 16 pg/ml) than in stable MS (serum 69 +/- 7 pg/ml; CSF 25 +/- 2 pg/ml). Among OIND patients, those with HIV-1-associated dementia showed high serum and CSF levels of both MCP-1 and IP-10. Those with encephalitis showed high serum and CSF levels of IP-10 and CSF mononuclear pleiocytosis. We also evaluated the effects of 6-methylprednisolone or IFN-beta 1a therapy on circulating MCP-1 and IP-10 levels. Neither MCP-1 nor IP-10 post-therapy levels varied significantly from baseline values. Our findings suggest that (a) MCP-1 could be constitutively produced within the brain; (b) MCP-1 and IP-10 CSF levels in acute MS vary significantly from those in stable MS. and these variations are inverse: and (c) current MS therapies do not modify circulating levels of MCP-1 and IP-10. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据