4.8 Article

Anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and neuroprotective effects of activated protein C in a murine model of focal ischemic stroke

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 103, 期 13, 页码 1799-1805

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.13.1799

关键词

proteins; ischemia; blood cells; cerebrovascular disorders; thrombosis; nervous system

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-63290] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Activated protein C (APC) contributes to systemic anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory activities. APC may reduce organ damage by inhibiting thrombin generation and leukocyte activation. Neutrophils and cerebrovascular thrombosis contribute to ischemic neuronal injury, suggesting that APC may be a potential protective agent for stroke. Methods and Results-We examined the effects of APC in a murine model of focal ischemia. After middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion, the average survival time in controls was 13.6 hours. Animals that received purified human plasma-derived APC 2 mg/kg IV either 15 minutes before or 10 minutes after stroke induction survived 24 hours and were killed for neuropathological analysis. APC 2 mg/kg given before or after onset of ischemia restored cerebral blood flow, reduced brain infarct volume (59% to 69%; P<0.003) and brain edema (50% to 61%; P<0.05), eliminated brain infiltration with neutrophils, and reduced the number of fibrin-positive cerebral vessels by 57% (P<0.05) and 25% (nonsignificant), respectively. The neuroprotective effect of APC was dose-dependent and associated with significant inhibition of ICAM-1 expression on ischemic cerebral blood vessels (eg, 61% inhibition with 2 mg/kg APC). Intracerebral bleeding was not observed with APC. Conclusions-APC exerts anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and neuroprotective effects in stroke. Central effects of APC are likely to be related to improved maintenance of the blood-brain barrier to neutrophils and to reduced microvascular obstructions and fibrin deposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据