4.3 Article

Genetic diversity of Hemarthria altissima and its related species by EST-SSR and SCoT markers

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 338-344

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2014.09.016

关键词

Hemarthria R. Br.; Hemarthria altissima; Genetic diversity; EST-SSR; SCoT

资金

  1. Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System [CARS-35-05]
  2. Sichuan Province Breeding Research grant [2011YZGG-11]
  3. Sichuan Agricultural University Excellent Master's Degree Papers Breeding [YS2014003]
  4. Students' Research Interests Plan in Sichuan Agricultural University [20130020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a need for an appropriate evaluation of Hemarthria germplasm resources using genetic analysis. Understanding their genetic background will promote effective development and utilization of its germplasm resources in plant breeding. We examined the genetic diversity and relationships among 46 Hemarthria germplasm resources from four continents. Expressed Sequence Tags-Simple Sequence Repeat (EST-SSR) and Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) markers were used to investigate species Hemarthria altissima (36), Hemarthria compressa (8) and Hemarthria uncinata (2). We selected 19 EST-SSR primers and generated 550 polymorphic (94.7%). Twenty one SCoT primers were selected and amplified to produce 597 bands with 89.4% of polymorphic bands. The Mantel test between EST-SSR and SCoT matrices revealed significant correlations (r = 0.854) and the data from both markers were combined for cluster analysis. The 46 materials were clustered into two main groups by UPGMA clustering with a similarity coefficient ranging from 0.573 to 0.940 and the dendrogram was basically concordant with geographical origins and species. Among the three Hemarthria species, H. altissima was genetically closest to H. compressa while it was not close to H. uncinata. When the utility of the two markers were compared, we found EST-SSR to be more efficient than SCoT in determining the genetic diversity study of Hemarthria species. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据