4.6 Article

Rapamycin-insensitive regulation of 4E-BP1 in regenerating rat liver

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 276, 期 14, 页码 10943-10951

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M007758200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In cultured cells, growth factor-induced phosphorylation of two translation modulators, p70 S6 kinase and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), is blocked by nanomolar concentrations of the immunosuppressant rapamycin. Rapamycin also attenuates liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy, but it is not known if this growth-suppressive effect is due to dephosphorylation of p70 S6 kinase and/or 4E-BP1. We found that partial hepatectomy induced a transient increase in liver p70 S6 kinase activity and 4E-8P1 phosphorylation as compared with sham-operated rats. The amount of p70 S6 kinase protein in regenerating liver did not increase, but active kinase from partially hepatectomized animals was highly phosphorylated. Phosphorylated 4E-BP1 from regenerating liver was unable to form an inhibitory complex with initiation factor 4E. Rapamycin blocked the activation of p70 S6 kinase in response to partial hepatectomy in a dose-dependent manner, but 4E-BP1 phosphorylation was not inhibited. By contrast, functional phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 induced by injection of cycloheximide or growth factors was partially reversed by the drug. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) has been proposed to directly phosphorylate 4E-BP1. Western blot analysis using phospho-specific antibodies showed that phosphorylation of Thr-36/45 and Ser-64 increased in response to partial hepatectomy in a rapamycin-resistant manner. Thus, rapamycin inhibits p70 S6 kinase activation and liver regeneration, but not functional phosphorylation of 4E-BP1, in response to partial hepatectomy. These results indicate that the effect of rapamycin on 4E-BP1 function in vivo can be significantly different from its effect in cultured cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据