4.7 Article

Diffusion MRI in ischemic stroke compared to pathologically verified infarction

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 914-920

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.56.7.914

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 13213] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 34626] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Diffusion MRI abnormality correlates with pathology in animal ischemic stroke models. A combined retrospective and prospective analysis of consecutive patients over a 3-year period who had a clinical diagnosis of probable new ischemic stroke, underwent diffusion MRI, and were later studied at autopsy was performed. Methods: Inclusion criteria for the retrospective analysis were 1) symptom onset within 14 days of presentation, 2) diffusion MRI within 28 days of symptom onset, and 3) autopsy within 16 weeks of symptom onset. Patients with suspected further infarcts between;MRI and autopsy were excluded. The locations of all areas of MRI abnormality were identified by a blinded neuroradiologist, and recent infarcts were identified by review of pathologic records and microscopic slides. Results: Eleven patients were identified who fulfilled inclusion criteria, with 25 discrete pathologic infarcts. Diffusion MRI abnormality corresponded to pathologically verified infarction in 23 cases, was present in two locations where no pathologic infarct was identified, and was absent in two locations where an infarct was present at autopsy. In two cases, despite clinical suspicion of acute ischemic stroke, no MRI abnormality or pathologic infarct was found. The sensitivity and specificity of diffusion MRI were 88.5% (95% CI, 69.9% to 97.6%) and 96.6% (95% CI, 91.5% to 99.1%). Accuracy was 95.1% (95% CI? 90.2% to 98%). Three further patients who died during the course of the retrospective analysis were studied prospectively, and are described separately. Conclusions: These findings suggest high accuracy of diffusion MRI for detection of ischemic infarction compared with pathologic examination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据