4.7 Article

Longitudinal study of blood pressure and white matter hyperintensities -: The EVA MRI cohort

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 921-926

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.56.7.921

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the relationship between baseline hypertension and severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) at 4-year follow-up in a sample of subjects aged 59 to 71 years old at entry. Methods: Subjects were participants in the Epidemiology of Vascular Ageing study, a longitudinal study on vascular aging and cognitive decline. At 4-year follow-up, 845 subjects had a cerebral MRI. MRI examinations were read by a single rater to determine the severity of WMH, ranging from absent to severe. Hypertension at each wave of the study was defined as systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg, or use of antihypertensive medication. Results: Hypertension at baseline was significantly associated with an increased risk of having severe WMH at 4-year follow-up. When taking into account both blood pressure levels and antihypertensive drug intake, analysis showed that the risk of having severe WMH was significantly reduced in subjects with normal blood pressure taking antihypertensive medication compared with those with high blood pressure taking antihypertensive agents. Cross-sectional relationships between hypertension and WMH at 4-year follow-up showed that the frequency of severe WMH was significantly higher in people who were hypertensive at both baseline and 4-year follow-up than those who were hypertensive only at I-year follow-up. Conclusions: Hypertension is a major risk factor for severe WMH. Subjects taking antihypertensive drugs and who have controlled blood pressure had a reduced risk of severe WMH. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate whether reduction of the development of WMH, by treatment and prevention of hypertension, might reduce the subsequent risk of cognitive deterioration or stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据