4.4 Article

Features of the 3'-consensus sequence of rotavirus mRNAs critical to minus strand synthesis

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 282, 期 2, 页码 221-229

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/viro.2001.0825

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The last seven nucleotides of the 3 ' -end of rotavirus mRNAs, 5 ' -UGUGACC-3 ', are highly conserved acid form a cis-acting signal that can promote the synthesis of (-) strand RNA to produce the viral dsRNA genome in vitro. Previous studies have shown that the sequence, location, and strandedness (single- versus double-stranded) of the 3 ' -consensus sequence of the mRNA affect the efficiency of (-) strand synthesis. In this study. we have used exhaustive mutagenesis of the SA11 gene 8 mRNA and an in vitro replication system to define the importance of each of the residues in the consensus sequence in (-) strand synthesis. The analysis showed that the CC of the consensus sequence was the most critical for (-) strand synthesis. Furthermore, the data revealed that other, but not all, residues of the consensus sequence contributed to efficient(-) strand synthesis in vitro. Mutant gene 8 RNAs supported an intermediate level of (-) strand synthesis when the 15 nt sequence upstream of the CC was replaced with long tracts of poly(A) or poly(U), but not with poly(G). Predictions of the secondary structure of the mutant RNAs suggested that the poly(G)-RNA could not replicate because its 3 ' -terminus was largely basepaired, instead of extending as a single-stranded tail as is the case for the 3 ' -termini of the poly(A)- and poly(U)-RNAs and wild-type gene 8 RNA. Subsequent experiments performed with complementary oligonucleotides indicated that efficient RNA replication occurs in vitro only when the last four residues of the 3 ' -consensus sequence, and most importantly the two terminal C's, existed in a single-stranded form. A single-stranded CC may be crucial for formation of an initiation complex for (-) strand synthesis consisting of viral RdRP, mRNA, and the dinucleotide pGpG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据