4.2 Article

Anatomical MRI study of basal ganglia in bipolar disorder patients

期刊

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING
卷 106, 期 2, 页码 65-80

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4927(01)00073-7

关键词

caudate; putamen; globus pallidus; mood disorders; brain imaging; magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 29618, MH 01736, MH 30915] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined possible anatomical abnormalities in basal ganglia structures in bipolar disorder patients. Caudate and putamen gray matter volumes, and globus pallidus total volume were measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 22 DSM-IV bipolar patients (age +/- S.D. = 36 +/- 10 years; eight drug-free and 14 lithium monotherapy patients) and 22 matched healthy control subjects (age +/- S.D. = 38 +/- 10 years). No significant differences were found between bipolar patients and healthy control subjects for any of the basal ganglia measures (t-tests, P > 0.05). Age was inversely correlated with left putamen volumes in patients (R = -0.44, P = 0.04), but not in healthy control subjects (R = -0.33. P = 0.14). Older patients ( > 36 years old) had a significantly larger left globus pallidus than younger ones (less than or equal to 36 years old) (ANOVA, P = 0.01). In a multiple regression analysis, after entering age as independent variable, the length of illness predicted smaller left putamen volumes, explaining 10.4% of the variance (F = 4.07, d.f. = 2, P = 0.03). No significant effects of episode type, number of prior episodes, or gender were found in any basal ganglia measurements (ANOVA, P > 0.05). In conclusion, our findings indicate that the basal ganglia may be anatomically preserved in bipolar patients. This is in contrast to available findings for unipolar disorder. However, our findings also suggest that age and length of illness may have significant effects on basal ganglia structures in bipolar patients, which may be more pronounced among bipolar I patients, and of relevance for the pathophysiology of the disorder. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. Ail rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据