4.7 Article

Selective dopaminergic vulnerability: 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde targets mitochondria

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 924-931

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00484-1

关键词

free radicals; Parkinson's disease; reactive species; dopamine; mitochondria; permeability transition

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG09014, AG14390, AG15354] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS038741] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a major cause of age-related morbidity and mortality, present in nearly 1% of individuals at ages 70-79 and similar to2.5% of individuals at age 85. L-DOPA (L-dihydroxyphenylalanine), which is metabolized to dopamine by dopa decarboxylase. is the primary therapy for PD, but may also contribute to disease progression. Association between mitochondrial dysfunction, monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity, and dopaminergic neurotoxicity has been repeatedly observed, but the mechanisms underlying selective dopaminergic neuron depletion in aging and neurodegenerative disorders remain unclear. We now report that 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetaldehyde (DOPAL), the MAO metabolite of dopamine, is more cytotoxic in neuronally differentiated PC 12 cells than dopamine and several of its metabolites. In isolated, energetically compromised mitochondria, physiological concentrations of DOPAL induced the permeability transition (PT), a trigger for cell death. Dopamine was > 1000-fold less potent. PT inhibitors protected both mitochondria and cells against DOPAL. Sensitivity to DOPAL was reduced greater than or equal to 30-fold in fully energized mitochondria, suggesting that mitochondrial respiration may increase resistance to PT induction by the endogenous DOPAL in the substantia nigra. These data provide a potential mechanism of action for L-DOPA-mediated neurotoxicity and suggest two potentially interactive mechanisms for the selective vulnerability of neurons exposed to dopamine. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据