4.5 Article

Differential involvement of peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptors α and δ in fibrate and fatty-acid-mediated inductions of the gene encoding liver fatty-acid-binding protein in the liver and the small intestine

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 355, 期 -, 页码 481-488

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS
DOI: 10.1042/0264-6021:3550481

关键词

lipid homoeostasis; PPAR alpha-null mice; PPAR delta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver fatty-acid-binding protein (L-FABP) is a cytoplasmic polypeptide that binds with strong affinity especially to long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs), It is highly expressed in both the liver and small intestine, where it is thought to have an essential role in the control of the cellular fatty acid (FA) flux, Because expression of the gene encoding L-FABP is increased by both fibrate hypolipidaemic drugs and LCFAs, it seems to be under the control of transcription factors, termed peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), activated by fibrate or FAs. However, the precise molecular mechanism by which these regulations take place remain to be fully substantiated, Using transfection assays, we found that the different PPAR subtypes (alpha, gamma and delta) are able to mediate the up-regulation by FAs of the gene encoding L-FABP in vitro. Through analysis of LCFA- and fibrate-mediated effects on L-FABP mRNA levels in wild-type and PPAR alpha -null mice, we have found that PPAR alpha in the intestine does not constitute a dominant regulator of L-FABP gene expression, in contrast with what is known in the liver, Only the PPAR delta/alpha agonist GW2433 is able to up-regulate the gene encoding L-FABP in the intestine of PPAR alpha -null mice, These findings demonstrate that PPARB can act as a fibrate/FA-activated receptor in tissues in which it is highly expressed and that L-FABP is a PPAR delta target gene in the small intestine, We propose that PPAR delta contributes to metabolic adaptation of the small intestine to changes in the lipid content of the diet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据