4.7 Article

Analysis of p53/BAX/p16ink4a/CDKN2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma:: High BAX and p16nk4a/CDKN2 identifies patients with good prognosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 2272-2281

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2272

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We have previously shown that loss of BAX expression is a negative prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer. In the present study, we addressed the prognostic relevance of BAX and its upstream regulator p53 in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus. Analysis of p16(ink4a/CDKN2) was included because p16(ink4a/CDKN2) and p53 were shown previously to cooperate during induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 53 patients with curative intended RO resection of esophageal SEC was done. protein expression of BAX, p53, and p16(ink4a/CDKN2) was investigated by immunohistochemistry. in addition, tumor DNA was screened for BAX frameshift mutations by fragment length analysis and for p53 mutations by single-strand conformation polymorphism-polymerase chain reaction. Results: Overali median survival was 13.7 months. patients with high BAX protein expression had a median survival of 19.5 months versus 8.0 months with low BAX expression (P <.005). High p16(ink4a/CDKN2) protein expression was associated with a median survival of 23.8 months versus 9.7 months with low p16(ink4a/CDKN2) (P = .011). The best survival (median, 45.8 months) was seen in a subgroup of 12 patients whose tumors bore the combination of both favorite phenotypes tie, high BAX and high p16(ink4a/CDKN2) protein expression). Conclusion: In this retrospective investigation, the combined analysis of BAX and p16(ink4a/CDKN2) shows subgroups in SCC of the esophagus with favorable (p16(ink4a/CDKN2)/BAX high expressing) or poor prognosis (loss of p16(ink4a/CDKN2)/loss of BAX). We suggest that such a multimarker analysis of apoptosis pathways could be useful for individualization of therapeutic strategies in the future, and suggest prospective studies to confirm these results. <(c)> 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据