4.7 Article

Distinct K currents result in physiologically distinct cell types in the inferior colliculus of the rat

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 2861-2877

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02861.2001

关键词

inferior colliculus; adaptation; rebound firing; high-threshold potassium current; Ca2+-dependent K+ current; charybdotoxin; apamin; A-current; Ca2+ spikes

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01-DC00189, R01 DC000189] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inferior colliculus (IC) processes auditory information ascending from the brainstem. The response of the IC to this information and its ability to transform it is partly determined by the types of ionic currents that generate the intrinsic discharge patterns of IC neurons and their susceptibility to changes in the external environment. We have used whole-cell patch-clamp techniques on IC neurons in rat brain slices to characterize the potassium currents present and to correlate them with the firing patterns observed. Neurons in the IC can be classified into six physiologically distinct cell types. Each of these cell types has a firing pattern that is generated by a unique potassium current and set of cellular parameters. Sustained-regular cells show mainly delayed rectifier K+ channels. Onset cells have a unique high-threshold tetraethylammonium-sensitive K+ current. Pause-build cells have an A-current. Rebound-regular cells have calcium-dependent rebound depolarizations. Rebound-adapting cells have both an apamin-sensitive calcium-dependent K+ current and a calcium-dependent rebound depolarization. Transient-rebound cells have a charybdotoxin-sensitive calcium-dependent K+ current and a calcium-dependent rebound. Our data suggest that there would be similarities as well as differences among IC neurons in their responses to excitatory or inhibitory inputs. Furthermore, some cells are likely to show little or no plasticity and behave as simple relays of temporal and intensity information, whereas others are likely to transform their inputs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据