4.4 Article

Differential roles of ionic, aliphatic, and aromatic residues in membrane-protein interactions:: A surface plasmon resonance study on phospholipases A2

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 40, 期 15, 页码 4672-4678

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0020325

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM53987, GM52598] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The roles of cationic, aliphatic, and aromatic residues in the membrane association and dissociation of five phospholipases A(2), (PLA(2)), including Asp-49 PLA(2) from the venom of Agkistodon piscivorus piscivorus, acidic PLA(2) from the venom of Naja naja atra, human group Ila and V PLA(2)s, and the C2 domain of cytosolic PLA(2), were determined by surface plasmon resonance analysis. Cationic interfacial binding residues of A. p piscivorus PLA(2) (Lys-10) and human group IIa PLA(2) (Arg-7, Lys-10 and Lys-16). which mediate electrostatic interactions with anionic membranes, primarily accelerate the membrane association. Ln contrast, an aliphatic side chain of the C2 domain of cytosolic PLA(2) (Val-97), which penetrates into the hydrophobic core of the membrane and forms hydrophobic interactions, mainly slows the dissociation of membrane-bound protein, Aromatic residues of human group V PLA2 (Try-31) and N. n. atra PLA(2) (Trp-61, Phe-64, and Tyr-110) contribute to both membrane association and dissociation steps, and the relative contribution to these processes depends on the chemical nature and the orientation of the side chains as well as their location on the interfacial binding surface. On the basis of these results, a general model is proposed for the interfacial binding of peripheral proteins, in which electrostatic interactions by ionic and aromatic residues initially bring the protein to the membrane surface and the subsequent membrane penetration and hydrophobic interactions by aliphatic and aromatic residues stabilize the membrane-protein complexes, thereby elongating the membrane residence time of protein.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据