4.5 Article

Expression of active caspase-3 in mitotic and postmitotic cells of the rat forebrain

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 433, 期 1, 页码 4-22

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.1121

关键词

cell death; neurogenesis; olfactory bulb; brain development; mitosis; stem cells

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC03840] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Active caspase-3 immunoreactivity was detected in the rat forebrain proliferative regions at birth and remained high in these areas for about 2 weeks, during which period labeled cells were present centroperipherally across the olfactory bulb. By the end of the third postnatal week, only a small number of immunolabeled cells remained in these forebrain structures. Active caspase-3 immunolabeling was localized mostly to cell nuclei and co-localized partially with TuJ1 and NeuN immunoreactivity, but not with glial fibrially acidic protein, OX-42, gamma -aminobutyric acid, or terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive labeling. Active caspase-3 and 5-bromo-2 ' -deoxyuridine (BrdU) double-labeled nuclei were seen in the proliferative regions after 2 hours and in the periglomerular region of the bulb after 7 days following BrdU injections. Examination of the cells with electron microscopy confirmed that the active caspase-3-containing nuclei in the proliferative regions often had infoldings and appeared to be undergoing division. Some of the cells with active caspase-3-labeled nuclei in the bulb had synapses on their somata or dendrites. Labeled dendritic spines and a few axon terminals were also observed in the olfactory bulb. Taken together, it appears that a wave of active caspase-3-positive cells are dividing in the proliferative zones and then migrating to the bulb as they differentiate into neurons. Therefore, active caspase-3 may play a role in cellular processes such as neuronal differentiation, migration, and plasticity, in addition to its role in cell death. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据