4.7 Article

Neuromuscular transmission in migraine - A single-fiber EMG study in clinical subgroups

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 1038-1043

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.56.8.1038

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To search for impairment of neuromuscular transmission by single-fiber electromyography (SFEMG) in patients with common forms of migraine. Background: P/Q Ca2+ channels are genetically abnormal in most cases of familial hemiplegic. migraine (International Headache Society; [IHS] code 1.2.3) and may be involved in other types of migraine. Besides ill the brain, these channels are found in motor nerve endings, where they control stimulation-induced acetylcholine release. If they are functionally abnormal, the neuromuscular transmission might be impaired. Methods: Sixty-two migraineurs (18 without aura, IHS code 1.1; 19 with typical aura, IHS code 1.2.1; 10 with prolonged aura, IHS code 1.2.2; 15 with and without aura! and 16 healthy control subjects underwent stimulation SFEMG. Results were expressed as the mean value of consecutive differences (MCD) and percentage of single-fiber abnormalities (abnormal jitter or impulse blocking). Results: Average MCD was comparable in control subjects and migraineurs (17.1 +/- 2.6 versus 17.5 +/- 4.7 mu sec). By contrast, single-fiber abnormalities there found in 17 patients but in none of the control subjects (p = 0.036). Most of these patients had unilateral sensorimotor symptoms and/or aphasia and/or loss of balance during the aura. SFEMG abnormalities were significantly correlated with the occurrence of these clinical features and with a diagnosis of migraine with prolonged aura. Conclusions: Stimulation SFEMG shows mild abnormalities of neuromuscular transmission in a subgroup of migraineurs with aura, characterized by clinical features frequently found in human P/Q Ca2+ channelopathies. These abnormalities might thus be due to genetically modified P/Q Ca2+ channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据