4.5 Article

Basic fibroblast growth factor induces primordial follicle development and initiates folliculogenesis

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 175, 期 1-2, 页码 123-130

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00391-4

关键词

basic fibroblast growth factor; kit ligand; primordial; follicle; ovary; development; mesenchymal-epithelial cell-cell interactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recruitment of primordial follicles to initiate folliculogenesis determines the population of developing follicles available for ovulation and directly regulates female reproductive efficiency. In the current study, a floating organ culture system was used to examine the progression of primordial (stage 0) follicles to developing (stages 1-4) follicles in 4-day-old pre-pubertal rat ovaries. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was found to induce primordial follicle development similar to what has been demonstrated for kit ligand/stem cell factor (KL). The bFGF-treated ovaries contained 85% developing follicles compared with 50% developing follicles for control untreated organ cultures. Correspondingly, the number of primordial follicles in bFGF-treated ovaries decreased to 15% of the total compared with 45% for controls. A bFGF neutralizing antibody was found to decrease the small amount of spontaneous follicle development that occurs during the organ culture. Basic FGF was localized to primordial and early developing follicles by immunocytochemistry and was primarily observed in the oocytes. Treatment of bovine ovarian theca cells and stroma cells with bFGF was found to promote cell growth. Basic FGF produced by the oocyte in early stage follicles appears to act on adjacent somatic cells to promote cell growth and development. Basic FGF, like KL, appears to be a primordial follicle-inducing factor. In summary, bFGF can regulate primordial follicle development that directly influences female reproductive efficiency. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据