4.7 Article

Dynamics of intramural and transmural reentry during ventricular fibrillation in isolated swine ventricles

期刊

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
卷 88, 期 8, 页码 839-848

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hh0801.089259

关键词

intramural reentry; fibrillation; anisotropy; Purkinje; papillary muscle

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL-66389, P50-HL-52319] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intramural dynamics of ventricular fibrillation (VF) remain poorly understood. Recent investigations have suggested that stable intramural reentry may underlie the mechanisms of VF. We performed optical mapping studies of VF in isolated swine right ventricles (RVs) and left ventricles (LVs). Nine RV walls were cut obliquely in their distal edge exposing the transmural surface, Six LV wedge preparations were also studied. Results showed that intramural reentry was present. In RV, 28 of 44 VF episodes showed reentry; 15% of the activation pathways were reentrant. Except for 4 episodes, reentry was transmural, involving subendocardial structures as the papillary muscle (PM) or trabeculae. Tn LV, reentry was observed in 27 of 27 VF episodes: 23% of the activations were part of reentrant pathways (P<0.05 compared with RV). All LV reentrant pathways were truly intramural (confined to the wall) and were frequently located at the PM insertion, In both ventricles, reentry was spatially and temporally unstable. Histological studies showed abrupt changes in fiber orientation at sites of reentry and wave splitting. Connexin 40 immunostaining demonstrated intramyocardial Purkinje fibers at sites of reentry in the PM root and around endocardial trabeculae. Our results confirm that reentry is frequent-but unstable-in the myocardial wall during VF. In RV, reentry is mostly transmural and requires participation of subendocardial structures. The LV has a greater incidence of reentry and is intramural, Anisotropic anatomic structures played key roles in the generation of wave splitting and in the maintenance of reentry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据