4.4 Article

Target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase in Trypanosoma brucei: an extended family

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 41, 期 -, 页码 934-938

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20130052

关键词

differentiation; quiescence; rapamycin; target of rapamycin complex 4 (TORC4); trypanosome

资金

  1. Miguel Servet fellowship [CP09/00300]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Plan Nacional [SAF2012-40029]
  3. Junta de Andalucia [CTS-5841]
  4. Red de Investigacion Cooperativa en Enfermedades Tropicales (RICET) [RD06/0001/0010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complex life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei provides an excellent model system to understand signalling pathways that regulate development. We described previously the classical functions of TOR (target of rapamycin) 1 and TOR2 in T. brucei. In a more recent study, we described a novel TOR kinase, named TOR4, which regulates differentiation from the proliferative infective form to the quiescent form. In contrast with TOR1 loss-of-function, down-regulation of TOR4 triggers an irreversible differentiation process through the development of the insect pre-adapted quiescent form. TOR4 governs a signalling pathway distinct from those controlled by the conventional TOR complexes TORC1 and TORC2. Depletion of TOR4 induces all well-known characteristics of the quiescent developmental stage in trypanosomes, including expression of the PAD (proteins associated with differentiation) surface proteins and transcriptional down-regulation of the VSG (variant surface glycoprotein) gene. TOR4 kinase forms a structurally and functionally distinct complex named TORC4. TOR4 associates with LST8 (lethal with sec-13 protein 8) and other factors including an armadillo-domain-containing protein and the major vault protein, which probably serves as a scaffold for this kinase. Research in T. brucei, a protozoan parasite that diverged from the eukaryotic tree early in evolution, may help to uncover new functions of TOR kinases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据