4.5 Article

The role of conserved tryptophan and acidic residues in the human dopamine transporter as characterized by site-directed mutagenesis

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 77, 期 4, 页码 1116-1127

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00312.x

关键词

binding; cocaine analogue; dopamine transporter; mutagenesis; uptake

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA 08379, DA 13261] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human dopamine (DA) transporter (hDAT) contains multiple tryptophans and acidic residues that are completely or highly conserved among Na+/Cl--dependent transporters. We have explored the roles of these residues using nonconservative substitution. Four of 17 mutants (E117Q, W132L, W177L and W184L) lacked plasma membrane immunostaining and were not functional. Both DA uptake and cocaine analog (i.e. 2 beta -carbomethoxy-3 beta-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane, CFT) binding were abolished in W63L and severely damaged in W311L. Four of five aspartate mutations (D68N, D313N, D345N and D436N) shifted the relative selectivity of the hDAT for cocaine analogs and DA by 10-24-fold. In particular, mutation of D345 in the third intracellular loop still allowed considerable [H-3]DA uptake, but caused undetectable [H-3]CFT binding. Upon anti-C-terminal-hDAT immunoblotting, D345N appeared as broad bands of 66-97 kDa, but this band could not be photoaffinity labeled with cocaine analog [I-125]-3 beta-(p-chlorophenyl)tropane-2 beta -carboxylic acid ([I-125]RTI-82). Unexpectedly. in this mutant, cocaine-like drugs remained potent inhibitors of [H-3]DA uptake. CFT solely raised the K-m of [H-3]DA uptake in wild-type hDAT, but increased K-m and decreased V-max in D345N, suggesting different mechanisms of inhibition. The data taken together indicate that mutation of conserved tryptophans or acidic residues in the hDAT greatly impacts ligand recognition and substrate transport. Additionally, binding of cocaine to the transporter may not be the only way by which cocaine analogs inhibit DA uptake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据