4.4 Article

Microbial iron-redox cycling in subsurface environments

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 1249-1256

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20120202

关键词

iron; metabolism; microbe; redox cycling; subsurface environment

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of Earth Sciences, Biogeosciences Program
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), Subsurface Biogeochemical Research Program
  3. SBR Science Focus Area at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  4. U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Astrobiology Institute Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In addition to its central role in mediating electron-transfer reactions within all living cells, iron undergoes extracellular redox transformations linked to microbial energy generation through utilization of Fe(II) as a source of chemical energy or Fe(III) as an electron acceptor for anaerobic respiration. These processes permit microbial populations and communities to engage in cyclic coupled iron oxidation and reduction within redox transition zones in subsurface environments. In the present paper, I review and synthesize a few case studies of iron-redox cycling in subsurface environments, highlighting key biochemical aspects of the extracellular iron-redox metabolisms involved. Of specific interest are the coupling of iron oxidation and reduction in field and experimental systems that model redox gradients and fluctuations in the subsurface, and novel pathways and organisms involved in the redox cycling of insoluble iron-bearing minerals. These findings set the stage for rapid expansion in our knowledge of the range of extracellular electron-transfer mechanisms utilized by subsurface micro-organisms. The observation that closely coupled oxidation and reduction of iron can take place under conditions common to the subsurface motivates this expansion in pursuit of molecular tools for studying iron-redox cycling communities in situ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据