4.4 Article

The self-perpetuating tau truncation circle

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 681-686

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20120015

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; neurodegenerative disorder; neuroproteomics; protein truncation; tau protein

资金

  1. Axon Neuroscience
  2. Slovak grant agency APVV [0399-10]
  3. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) [CRP/SVK 10-01]
  4. European Regional Development Fund [ITMS-26240220046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pathological truncations of human brain proteins represent the common feature of many neurodegenerative disorders including AD (Alzheimer's disease), Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease. Protein truncations significantly change the structure and function of these proteins and thus can engender their pathological metamorphosis. We have shown previously that truncated forms of tau protein are contained in the core of the paired helical filaments that represent the main constituent of neurofibrillary pathology. Recently, we have identified truncated tau species of a different molecular signature. We have found that tau truncation is not produced by a random process, but rather by highly specific proteolytic cleavage and/or nonenzymatic fragmentation. In order to characterize the pathophysiology of AD-specific truncated tau species, we have used a transgenic rat model for AD expressing human truncated tau. Expression of the tau protein induces the formation of novel truncated tau species that originate from both transgenic human tau and endogenous rat tau proteins. Moreover, these truncated tau proteins are found exclusively in the misfolded fraction of tau, suggesting that they actively participate in the tau misfolding process. These findings corroborate further the idea that the appearance of truncated tau species starts a self-perpetuating cycle of further tau protein truncation leading to and accelerating tau misfolding and formation of neurofibrillary pathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据