3.8 Article

Major ion chemistry of Renuka Lake and weathering processes, Sirmaur District, Himachal Pradesh, India

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY
卷 40, 期 7, 页码 908-917

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002540100268

关键词

black-shale; carbonate weathering; major ion chemistry; pyrite-ferrous; Renuka Lake

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renuka Lake in the Lesser Himalaya, Himachal Pradesh is in a valley surrounded by mountains comprised of highly crumpled, shattered, crushed, folded and dislocated rocks consisting of carbonaceous shales-slates often pyrite-ferrous, limestone, quartzites, boulder beds, etc. A detailed and systematic study of the major ion chemistry of the lake, clay mineral composition of the bed and core sediments and the Pb-210 isotope estimation in the latter was conducted. The chemistry is dominated by carbonate weathering and (Ca + Mg) and (HCO3 + SO4) accounts for about 90% of the cations and anions. The SO4 content is almost the same as the HCO3. The low contribution of (Na + K) to the total cations and the (Ca + Mg) and HCO3 data tends to indicate that silicate weathering has not been the potential source of major ions to the lake waters. This difference may be related to the increasing susceptibility to weathering of carbonate over silicate rocks exposed in the catchment and also seepage of water at the bottom. The high sulphate content in waters is derived from dissolution of pyrite-ferrous reduced black shales, which constitute a significant lithology in the catchment. The chemical index of alteration (CIA) value in core sediments is on an average 76, which is comparable with average shale (70-75) and the rate of sedimentation 3.3 mm/year based on measurement of Pb-210, indicating a fairly high weathering rate in the catchment. Illite is the dominant clay mineral (52-90%) in the bed and core sediments, chlorite constitutes 7-48% and the kaolinite-chlorite mixed silicate layer is 1-2%. This is consistent with the shale-slate, sandstone lithology in the valley.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据