4.4 Article

DNA studies of newly synthesized heteroleptic platinum(II) complexes [Pt(bpy)(iip)]2+ and [Pt(bpy)(miip)]2+

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 163-175

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-015-1317-8

关键词

Platinum; Polypyridyl ligand; DNA binding; Cytotoxicity; Transcription inhibition

资金

  1. TUBITAK [113S165]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new mono-nuclear heteroleptic platinum(II) complexes, [Pt(bpy)(iip)](PF6)(2) (1) and [Pt(bpy)(miip)](PF6)(2)center dot 2H(2)O (2) (bpy is 2,2'-bipyridine; iip is 2-(imidazo-4-yl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f] [1,10] phenanthroline; miip is 2-(1-methylimidazo-2-yl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-f] [1, 10] phenanthroline), have been synthesized and fully characterized by CHN analysis, electrospray ionization and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, H-1 NMR, FT-IR (ATR), and UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Cytotoxicity, ability to inhibit DNA transcription and DNAse activity of the complexes were studied. The DNA-binding behaviors of both complexes have also been studied by spectroscopic methods, cyclic voltammetry and viscosity measurements. Both complexes showed cytotoxic properties and 2 was more cytotoxic than 1. DNA transcription was inhibited upon increasing concentrations of both complexes. The complex 2 was found to be a better inhibitor than 1. The same pattern can be seen in the DNAse profile of the complexes. In addition, 2 was found to promote cleavage of pBR322 DNA at a lower concentration than 1. The spectroscopic, electrochemical and viscometric results indicate that both complexes show some degree of binding to DNA in an intercalative mode, resulting in intrinsic binding constants K (b) = 3.55 +/- A 0.6 x 10(4) M-1 and 7.01 +/- A 0.9 x 10(4) M-1 for 1 and 2, respectively. The difference in the DNA-binding affinities of 1 and 2 may presumably be explained by the methylated imidazole nitrogen atom that makes the compound more hydrophobic and gives better intercalative binding ability to DNA's hydrophobic environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据