4.7 Article

Regulation by insulin of gene expression in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue - Evidence for specific defects in type 2 diabetes

期刊

DIABETES
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 1134-1142

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.50.5.1134

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defective regulation of gene expression may be involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. me have characterized the concerted regulation by insulin (3-h hyperinsulinemic clamp) of the expression of 10 genes related to insulin action in skeletal muscle and in subcutaneous adipose tissue, and we have verified whether a defective regulation of some of them could be specifically encountered in tissues of type 2 diabetic patients. Basal mRNA levels (determined by reverse transcriptase-competitive polymerase chain reaction) of insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate-1, p85 alpha phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), p110 alpha PI3K, p110 beta PI3K, GLUT4, glycogen synthase, and sterol regulatory-element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) were similar in muscle of control (n = 17), type 2 diabetic (n = 9), type 1 diabetic (n = 9), and nondiabetic obese (n = 9) subjects. In muscle, the expression of hexokinase II was decreased in type 2 diabetic patients (P < 0.01). In adipose tissue, SREBP-1c (P < 0.01) mRNA expression was reduced in obese (nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic) subjects and was negatively correlated with the BMI: of the subjects (r = -0.63, P = 0.02). Insulin (1,000 pmol/L) induced a two- to threefold increase (P < 0.05) in hexokinase II, p85 alpha PI3K, and SREBP-1c mRNA levels in muscle and in adipose tissue in control subjects, in insulin-resistant nondiabetic obese patients, and in hyperglycemic type 1 diabetic subjects. Upregulation of these genes was completely blunted in type 2 diabetic patients. This study thus provides evidence for a specific defect in the regulation of a group of important genes in response to insulin in peripheral tissues of type 2 diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据