4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Disruption of neuronal function by soluble hyperphosphorylated tau in a Drosophila model of tauopathy

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 564-570

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST0380564

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; axonal transport; lithium; microtubule; neurofibrillary tangle; synapse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Axonal microtubules are essential for transport of materials to the synapse. Compromised microtubules and synaptic loss have been demonstrated in AD (Alzheimer's disease), which is believed to contribute to cognitive dysfunction before neuronal death in the early stages of the disease. The mechanism by which hyperphosphorylated tau, the building block of neurofibrillary tangles, one of the pathological hallmarks of AD, disrupts neuronal and synaptic function is unclear. There is a theory that hyperphosphorylated tau does not bind effectively to microtubules and is no longer able to function in stabilizing them, thus axonal transport can no longer proceed efficiently. This leads to synaptic dysfunction. We have tested this theory in a Drosophila model of tauopathies in which we expressed human tau (h-tau). Using this model, we have tested all aspects of this hypothesis and have demonstrated that axonal transport does become compromised in the presence of hyperphosphorylated h-tau and this leads to synaptic and behavioural defects. We are currently investigating the mechanism by which hyperphosphorylated h-tau mediates this effect and are preliminary data indicate that this entails phospho-tau-mediated effects that are predicted by the tau-microtubule hypothesis, as well as novel effects. These deleterious effects of h-tau occur in the absence of tau filaments and before neuronal death This sequence of pathogenic events may constitute the mechanism by which abnormal tau disrupts neuronal and synaptic function and contributes to cognitive impairment before neuronal death in the early stages of tauopathies such as AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据