4.4 Article

Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 by oxindolimine ligands and corresponding copper and zinc complexes

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 1205-1217

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-015-1300-4

关键词

Oxindolimine-metal complexes; Cytotoxicity mechanism; Kinase inhibitors; Molecular dynamics; Molecular docking

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2010/51842-3, 2011/50318-1, 2013/07937-8]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico Tecnologico (CNPq) [573530/2008-4]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade de Sao Paulo (PRPUSP) [2011.1.9352.1.8]
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/50318-1] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxindolimine-copper(II) and zinc(II) complexes that previously have shown to induce apoptosis, with DNA and mitochondria as main targets, exhibit here significant inhibition of kinase CDK1/cyclin B protein. Copper species are more active than the corresponding zinc, and the free ligand shows to be less active, indicating a major influence of coordination in the process, and a further modulation by the coordinated ligand. Molecular docking and classical molecular dynamics provide a better understanding of the effectiveness and kinase inhibition mechanism by these compounds, showing that the metal complex provides a stronger interaction than the free ligand with the ATP-binding site. The metal ion introduces charge in the oxindole species, giving it a more rigid conformation that then becomes more effective in its interactions with the protein active site. Analogous experiments resulted in no significant effect regarding phosphatase inhibition. These results can explain the cytotoxicity of these metal complexes towards different tumor cells, in addition to its capability of binding to DNA, and decreasing membrane potential of mitochondria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据