4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase in respiratory diseases

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 886-891

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST0370886

关键词

asthma; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (iNOS inhibitor); lung disease; nitrative stress; nitric oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide (NO) is a key physiological mediator and disturbed regulation of NO release is associated with the pathophysiology of almost all inflammatory diseases. A multitude of inhibitors of NOSs (nitric oxide synthases) have been developed, initially with low or even no selectivity against the constitutively expressed NOS isoforms, eNOS (endothelial NOS) and nNOS (neuronal NOS). in the meanwhile these efforts yielded potent and highly selective NOS (inducible NOS) inhibitors. Moreover, NOS inhibitors have been shown to exert beneficial anti-inflammatory effects in a wide variety of acute and chronic animal models of inflammation. in the present mini-review, we summarize some of our current knowledge of inhibitors of the NOS isoenzyme, their biochemical properties and efficacy in animal models of pulmonary diseases and in human disease itself. moreover, the potential benefit of NOS inhibition in animal models of COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), such as cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary inflammation, has not been explicitly studied so far. in this context, we demonstrated recently that both a semi-selective NOS inhibitor {L-NIL [N6-(1-iminoethyl)-L-lysine hydrochloride]} and highly selective NOS inhibitors (GW274150 and BYK402750) potently diminished inflammation in a cigarette smoke mouse model mimicking certain aspects of human COPD. Therefore, despite the disappointing results from recent asthma trials, NOS inhibition could still be of therapeutic utility in COPD, a concept which needs to be challenged and validated in human disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据